Uganda

Geographical Info

Total : 241,038 sq km

Capital City: Kampala

Independence on 9 October 1962 from Britain 

Government type: Presidential Republic

Main Parties/Dominant Parties: National Resistance Movement (NRM)

President: President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni since 26 January 1986.

Economic activities: The Uganda economy is diversified with key sectors including agriculture, tourism, industry, and the service sector. 

Transport: Not well-developed transport infrastructure network

Climatic/environmental issues: Tropical; generally rainy with two dry seasons (December to February, June to August). Environmental issues include the draining of wetlands for agricultural use, deforestation, overgrazing, soil erosion, water pollution from industrial discharge and water hyacinth infestation in Lake Victoria, and widespread poaching of elephants.

Ethnic groups: Baganda 16.5%, Banyankole 9.6%, Basoga 8.8%, Bakiga 7.1%, Iteso 7%, Langi 6.3%, Bagisu 4.9%, Acholi 4.4%, Lugbara 3.3%, and other ethnicities 32.1% 

Official language(s): English

Religions: 45.1% Protestant (comprised of Anglican 32.0%, Pentecostal/Born Again Evangelical 11.1%, Seventh Day Adventist 1.7%, Baptist 0.3%), 39.3% Roman Catholic, 13.7% Muslim, 1.6% other and 0.2% none.

Social issues: Poverty, inequality, armed fighting between hostile ethnic groups, corruption, unemployment, and rebels.

Neighbouring countries: Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, and Tanzania

Source: CIA World Factbook, 2024

Historical Background

Uganda has been and still is an important country for refugees and asylum seekers. The process of hosting refugees in Uganda can be traced as far back as after the Second World War when the country hosted about 7000 Polish refugees (Wamara, 2021). The Ugandan government has put forward a welcoming narrative both domestically and internationally, based on the idea of helping “brothers” in need and Pan-Africanism (ODI, 2020) and cognizant that many Ugandans, including senior government officials, experienced displacement at some stage. Ugandans understand the plight of refugees. This messaging is broadly echoed by wider actors, including Uganda’s media (Ibid). 

Uganda receives refugees from Burundi, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia, and many more. According to UNHCR (2023b), the country has hosted more than 1.5 million refugees. 

Migration in Uganda has been driven by political factors, poverty, rapid population growth, and the porosity of its international borders (IOM, 2015). After its independence in 1962, Uganda experienced civil war and ethnic strife until the mid-1980s. In 1986, the National Resistance Movement assumed power, and Yoweri Museveni became president, which he still is in 2024. Since then, the country has progressed toward democracy, and its economy has grown (IOM, 2015). 

However, Northern Uganda has had to go through some economic and security issues in the last decades. Approximately 1.7 million people in the Acholi region in the north were displaced because of over 20 years of armed conflict between the Lord’s Resistance Army led by Joseph Kony and the Ugandan government. Because of this, and natural disasters and political shocks, the northern regions of Uganda have been underdeveloped relative to the other regions, giving rise to persistent inequality issues in the country. Voluntary internal migration has been a trend in the country throughout history, with the major reason being the search for employment opportunities (IOM, 2015).

Similar ethnicities live across borders, which means that ethnic ties transcend the borders with neighbouring countries. As the borders with these countries are considered quite porous, and as total border surveillance is practically impossible with current resources, unknown immigration and emigration routinely take place (IOM, 2015). 

Uganda’s emigration can be understood by using a metaphor of waves. There have been three waves so to speak. The first wave happened while Idi Amin Dada was president when he expelled 80,000 Ugandans of South Asian origin. The second wave happened between 1971 and 1986 when thousands of refugees fled Uganda due to armed conflict and political instability. The third wave is currently happening because of ties with Ugandan diasporas and push and pull factors resulting from globalization’s labour mobility (IOM, 2015). 

Migration Policies

The most important law governing immigration to Uganda is the Citizenship and Immigration Control Act of 1999, amended in 2009. This law regulates the entry and residence of migrants in Uganda, as well as the issue of citizenship. It does not discuss emigration or return migration (IOM, 2015), and the IOM also states that the legal framework is fragmented and does not address all aspects of migration (IOM, 2018a). The Refugee Act (2006) and the Refugee Regulations (2010) guarantee freedom of movement for refugees and access to social services (Ibid). They also allow refugees to apply for permits for a family member to enter and reside in Uganda. Upon registration, refugees receive a plot of land for settlement and agriculture (Ibid). When the refugee law was launched in 2006, a model was adopted for Africa, which allowed refugees to live in communities instead of in separate camps (Akello, 2009).

The National Policy for Internally Displaced Persons (2004) and the National Disaster Preparedness and Management Policy (2010) concern internally displaced persons, while the Prevention of Trafficking in Persons Act of 2008 is the key legislation on trafficking in human beings (IOM, 2015).

Uganda is a party to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Convention on the Status of Refugees 1951, the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, the additional provisions of the ILO Convention on Migrant Workers and the Conventions on Statelessness. Uganda is a party to the African Union Convention for The Protection and Assistance of Internally Displaced Persons in Africa (Kampala Convention) and the 1969 OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa.

Uganda, the United Republic of Tanzania, and Kenya were the founding states of the East African Community (EAC). In 2009 Uganda adopted the EAC Common Market Protocol, which allows the free movement of persons and the free movement of workers through the EAC (Ibid).

Uganda has a Prevention of Trafficking in Persons Act, 2008 aimed at combating human trafficking.

Governmental Institutions

The Ministry of Internal Affairs is responsible for the identification and census of the population. The National Council for Citizenship and Immigration and the Directorate for Citizenship and Immigration Control are responsible for monitoring the entry and residence of foreigners in the country, the registration of Ugandan citizens, the issues of passports and travel documents, and border control (IOM, 2015). The Diaspora Department (within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) manages relations with the diaspora in other countries. The National Coordination Mechanism on Migration is a formal inter-ministerial coordination mechanism, established in 2015, composed of government agencies, international organisations, civil society, and academia led by the Office of the Prime Minister (Ibid). An important role in terms of displacement is addressed by the Minister for Disaster Preparedness and Refugee Management.

Internal Migration

The most recent comprehensive data on internal migration in Uganda are data retrieved from the 2002 household survey held by Uganda’s Bureau of Statistics. According to the survey, there were 1,349,400 recent domestic migrants in 2002 (IOM, 2015). 65.9% of this number was found in urban areas, suggesting migration is predominantly rural to urban migration (Ibid). The number of female domestic migrants was higher than that of male domestic migrants in both urban and rural areas (Ibid). Unlike in the past when women migrated in most instances to accompany their spouses, currently women migrate independently in search of job opportunities. The largest share of domestic migrants was 15-29 years (603,600), followed by those 15 years or under (501,500) (Ibid).  56.5% said they were working, 39.1% were unemployed, and 4.4% were looking for work (Ibid) According to a study by the University of Makerere (Kampala), insecurity has been a significant factor in determining migration to Northern Uganda, while in the central region, the reason for migration has often been economic (Nagikanda, 2013). Voluntary internal migration was mainly to seek employment and other motivations, particularly for migrant women, including internal migration for marriage and related social movements (IOM, 2015). However, according to Maastricht University (2017), not much has changed concerning the pattern of internal migration in Uganda as revealed by the 2002 household survey. Nevertheless, more recently, changing climatic conditions appear to be a potential key driver of internal migration in Uganda. Because of the intricate connections between livelihoods, the economy, and the environment, adverse climatic conditions have a direct negative impact on the lives of Ugandans. According to Rigaud, et al. (2021), the impact of climate change, if not guarded against, could see the movement of about 12 million people, that is 11% of the country’s population moving within the country by 2050 in search of economic opportunities or source of livelihoods.  

Internally Displaced Persons

Before the agreement to the cessation of hostilities was signed between the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) and the government of Uganda in 2006, internal displacement was highly precipitated by conflict and violence. For example, in 2005, when the conflict was at its peak, there were 1.84 million internally displaced persons living in 251 camps. However, the numbers have declined significantly in recent years, with more displacement characterized by disasters, as examined below. 

Conflict

Although conflict and disaster continue to contribute to internal displacement in Uganda, it does so at a lower scale compared to pre-2006 before the signing of the cessation of hostilities agreement. Post the 2006 agreement, conflict is mostly driven by land disputes as returnees that were displaced by the LRA conflict compete for limited resources. According to the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (2021), between 2008 and 2021, there were 37,057 conflict and violence-related displacements in Uganda. Recently, by the end of 2021, the IDMC recorded 1,700 conflict and violence-related displacements in the country. For example, according to IOM, DTM as cited by IDMC (2021), 56 people were displaced because of conflict in the Rakai district and central region.   

Disaster

Natural disasters, for example, hailstorms, floods, and landslides contribute to internal displacement in Uganda. According to the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) (2021), between 2008 and 2021, there were 581,958 disaster-related internally displaced persons in Uganda. Recently in 2021, an estimated 46,700 people were internally displaced because of disasters. For example, in October 2021 landslide displaced 380 people in the eastern region, while hailstorms displaced 64 people in the western region in the same month (Ibid).

Immigration

Over the last decade, the number of international migrants residing in Uganda has increased considerably. In 2010, the stock of international migrants in Uganda was 492,930 (1.5% of the Ugandan population) (UN DESA, 2019). In 2015 it increased to 851,175 (2.2% of the population) and, in 2019, to an estimated 1,734,166 (3.9% of the population) (Ibid). According to UN DESA (2020), as cited by the Migration Data Portal (2021), Uganda’s international migration stock experienced a slight decrease from the 2019 data as it stood at 1.7 million (representing 3.8% of the total population). Uganda’s net migration rate has fluctuated over the last thirty years. According to Macrotrends (2023), between 2015 and 2021, Uganda experienced a positive net migration rate oscillating between 0.588 and 2.875. As a member of the East African Community (EAC) block that advocates for the free movement of its citizens across national borders, Uganda remains an attractive destination for international migrants. However, in 2022 and 2023, Uganda experienced a negative net migration rate of -1.090 and -2.367 respectively (Ibid). Most international migrants in Uganda come from neighbouring or nearby African countries.   In 2019, the main countries of origin of international migrants in Uganda were South Sudan (1.1 million), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (approximately 320,000), and Rwanda, Sudan, and Burundi each constituting about 60 to 70 thousand of the total international migrant stock (UN DESA, 2019).   

Female Migration

According to UN DESA (2020), as cited by the Migration Data Portal (2021), since 2000, the ratio of male to female international migrants has shifted such that there have been proportionately slightly more (0.4% more) female international migrants than male international migrants and the proportion has steadily increased since then. In 2010, 50.9% of the total number of international migrants were female (251,000), and in 2015, this was 51.1% (435,300) (Ibid). In 2019, it rose to 51.9% (892,600) (Ibid). This pattern reflects the global pattern of migration where more females than men have been migrating recently. Some international migrant women and children in Uganda are particularly vulnerable and exposed to different forms of abuse, neglect, stigmatization, malnutrition, and a high probability of being infected with communicable diseases (IOM, 2015). 

Children

According to UN DESA (2020), as cited by the Migration Data Portal (2021), in 2010, of the 492,900 immigrants residing in the country, 41.1% (202,089) of them were children 19 years and younger. In 2015, of the 851,200 immigrants residing in the country, 49.5% (421,344) of them were children, and in 2020, of the 1.7 million immigrants in Uganda in mid-year 2020, 57.5% (977,500) were children 19 years old and younger (Ibid). As shown in the graphic below this represents a significant increase in the number of child immigrants living in the country between 2010 and 2020. 

Within Uganda, internal migration among children is a common trend. For example, the IOM (2014) notes that there has been an increase in internal migration involving children, particularly from the Karamoja region to urban centres. The main motivation for migration to urban settings is to earn money following children’s actual or perceived responsibility to contribute to their households (Ibid). The children live in extreme poverty and are very vulnerable (Ibid). Their reasons for migration are linked to the decrease in the number of livestock in their region of origin and the general lack of livelihood opportunities, which makes children unable to contribute to the family’s income (Ibid). Internal child migration in Uganda is circular in nature in that children migrate to the urban centres to earn a living in various ways, return home with their earnings, and eventually migrate again to earn more. Although the government has placed a ban on street children’s donations, the societal expectation that children should contribute to household income contributes to the large number of children migrating to urban areas, without or with the approval of their parents, to earn money through begging, various gimmicks, or theft (IOM, 2015). In essence, begging mitigates the absence of employment opportunities and serves as a major source of income for some households. Unfortunately, because children invoke sympathy, they are often used by their parents as a bargaining chip in the process of begging.

Refugees and Asylum Seekers

According to UNHCR (2023a), Uganda is one of the five top countries that host the largest number of refugees and asylum seekers in the world. According to UNHCR (2023b), by March 2023, Uganda hosted 1,532,168 refugees. The top 5 origin countries of refugees and asylum seekers in Uganda are South Sudan 56.6% (867,391), Democratic Republic of Congo 31.8% (487,044), Somalia 4.6% (70,020), Burundi 2.7% (41,235), and Eritrea 2.1% (31,424) (Ibid). The refugees and asylum seekers are located in 13 districts namely Adjumani (209,574), Madi Okollo and Terego (204,188), Yumbe (190,718), Isingiro (179,718), Kampala (139,275), Kikuube (130,444), Obongi (122,205), Kyegegwa (120,111), Kamwenge (90,445), Lamwo (75,551), Kiryandongo (64,338), and Koboko (5,991) (Ibid). 

Uganda does not have an encampment policy. However, the government in collaboration with international organizations, for example, UNHCR, established refugee settlements, where refugees are provided with a piece of land to build their own houses and engage in livelihoods. While most of the refugees in Uganda are in refugee settlements others are in urban areas (self-settled refugees), especially, in Kampala. There are 13 refugee settlements in Uganda: Adjumani, Bidibidi, Imvepi, Kiryandongo, Kyaka II, Kyangwali, Lobule, Nakivale, Oruchinga, Palabek, Palorinya, Rhino Camp, and Rwamwanja (UNHCR, 2021). The refugees in the urban areas are scattered among low-income informal settlements. 

The refugee settlement model in Uganda has been applauded by many international organizations as it gives refugees a sense of security and self-reliance and facilitates their integration process within their host communities (Wamara, et al, 2021). However, there are certain challenges confronting refugees in Uganda. For example, while those in settlements are supported by the government and international organizations (food, health, education, and accommodation), their right to free movement is limited, and it retards their integration process. On the other hand, while self-settled refugees enjoy the right to free movement and it facilitates their integration process, they do not enjoy any form of support from international organizations and the government, and they live in informal settlements with insufficient access to water, sanitation, and hygiene and they are vulnerable to harassment and forced eviction (Norwegian Refugee Council, 2021). 

Uganda remains a referral point to many countries because of its progressive refugee hosting policy. 

Emigration

The most important attraction and push factor for Ugandan migration around and outside their country is employment, as economic opportunities in Uganda are limited (IOM, 2015). According to Afro Barometer (2019), one in three Ugandans has considered moving to another country, with a higher proportion of these aspirants being youth and the most educated. In 2010, there were an estimated 731,800 Ugandan emigrants abroad which rose to 786,200 in 2015 and dropped slightly to 781,400 In 2020 (Migration Data Portal, 2021). In 2013, the main destination countries of Ugandan emigrants were Kenya (271,149), South Sudan (120,808), Rwanda (106,501) the United Kingdom (64,223), and the United States of America (19,453) (United Nations, 2015). It is important to note that an increasing number of Ugandans, particularly domestic workers are migrating to the Middle East, growing from an average of 24,086 between 2016 and 2021 to 84,966 in 2022 (Zawya, 2023). The signing of a bilateral agreement between the government of Uganda and Saudi Arabia has made this destination a preferred destination for many Ugandans. For example, of the 84,960 migrant workers from Uganda in 2022, 77,914 went to Saudi Arabia, of which 55,643 were mainly housemaids (Ibid).  

Labour migration

With the diversification of East African economies, such as the Ugandan, Kenyan, and Rwandan economies, the demand for workers has increased (for example, in the services industry) and has drawn migrant workers from other East African countries (IOM, WMR, 2020). The East African Common Market Protocol, allowing for the free movement of labour, has facilitated labour migration within the East African sub-region (Ibid). Several countries have ratified this protocol, and some have already abolished work permits for East African citizens, for example, Kenya, Rwanda, and recently, in 2015, Uganda. This makes it easier for people to work across the sub-region (The East African, 2015). At the national level, Uganda’s Employment Act provides equal opportunities for immigrant workers as for national workers, who are legally residing in the country (IOM, 2018a).

Human trafficking

Uganda is ranked Tier 2 in the Trafficking in Person (2023) TIP Report as the government of Uganda does not meet the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking - although, in recent years, it has made some significant efforts. However, corruption amongst some law enforcement officials negatively impacts the government's fight against human trafficking in the country (US Department of State, 2023). Uganda remains a source, transit, and destination for children and women subjected to forced labour and sex trafficking.  Because of poverty and unemployment, traffickers prey on the vulnerabilities of children and women who are in desperate search of opportunities. Traffickers exploit women and children both in Uganda and abroad. Through local radio stations and social media, traffickers fraudulently advertise job opportunities in urban areas like Kampala that lure children into their trap (Ibid). Children from the Karamoja region (the poorest region in Uganda) are particularly vulnerable. For example, there are an estimated 2,057,00 children involved in child labour and 700 – 18,000 children are victims of sex trafficking in Uganda (Klabbers, et al. 2023). 

Abroad, some employment agencies exploit Ugandan women and children, particularly in the Middle East, as indicated by an unnamed NGO that 89% of Ugandans working in the Middle East experience conditions indicative of forced labour that include excessive working hours and passport confiscation (US Department of State, 2023). In 2022, the government investigated 1,200 incidents of human trafficking of which 589 involved exploitations in Uganda and abroad with most of the incidents (526) in Uganda. The government reported initiated prosecution against 728 alleged traffickers and secured the conviction of 73 traffickers in 589 cases which involved 338 cases of sex trafficking, 173 cases of labour trafficking, and 78 unspecified forms of trafficking (Ibid).

Remittances

According to the World Bank (2023), Uganda has experienced a steady increase in remittance flow into the country since 2015. In 2015, remittance flow stood at $902,157,540 (2.8% of GDP), in 2017, it increased to 1.17 billion (3.8% of GDP), in 2018, it went up to 1.42 billion (4% of GDP) (Ibid). However, with the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic which was characterized by the slowdown in economic activities all over the world, remittance flow to Uganda dropped to 1.06 billion in 2020 and slightly increased to 1.08 billion in 2021 (2.7% of GDP) (Ibid). Despite the decline, remittance flow still provides crucial support to many households in Uganda in safeguarding health care, food security, savings, and investment opportunities. Other factors that have negatively impacted the remittance flow to Uganda include the high cost of sending money which stood at 8.7%, more than double the 3% target of the Sustainable Development Goal recommendation (International Fund for Agricultural Development, 2021). 

Returns and Returnees

The government of Uganda, political movements, and international organizations play a very important role in assisting Ugandans abroad who voluntarily want to return home. For example, the International Organisation for Migration assisted more than 100 Ugandan vulnerable women in Saudi Arabia during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, which slowed down economic activities and placed travel restrictions on migrants (IOM, 2020). Still in the Middle East, the government of Uganda assisted 68 Ugandans stranded in Dubai, and the main opposition party, the National Unity Platform (NUP), indicated through one of their officials that the party has assisted 42 Ugandans to return home from Dubai (Monitor, 2022). However, some migrants return on their own without any assistance from the government, political movements, or non-governmental organisations. Before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, one of the challenges facing returnees was that while those who had obtained more than secondary school qualifications reintegrated economically, those with secondary or below qualifications did not enjoy the same advantage (Thomas, 2008). However, with the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, academic qualifications did not advantage returnees as they were all labelled, stereotyped, and discriminated against because they were seen as carriers of the coronavirus (Lubega & Ekol, 2020).

International organisations

The most important international organizations dealing with migration-related issues in Uganda include the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and the International Labour Organisation (ILO). The International Organisation for Migration focuses on migrant health, refugee resettlement, humanitarian assistance, migration for work reasons, migration policy and research, and it also assists the government in border management. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees guides and coordinates international actions to protect refugees and the International Labour Organisation develops programmes promoting decent work for all women and men including migrants. Other migration-related United Nations agencies in Uganda include the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) which provides support to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for capacity building, focusing on the management and policy of the diaspora. The United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) focuses on the migration of children, especially from Karamoja to different urban areas and helps families keep their children in school. The Norwegian Refugee Council, Justice Defenders, International Refugee Rights Initiative (IRRI), and War Child International, assist refugees and migrants with life-saving and long-term support.

Note on data 

“The measurement of migration in Uganda is characterized by the lack of regular statistics and weak management of administrative sources of data” (IOM, 2015, p.5). “Most administrative information is not available to the public or easily accessible to decision-makers.” (IOM, 2015, p.70).